Supreme Court News

∆     Petition filed against Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra seeking action under Contempt and Perjury.   ∆     Advocate Siddharth Luthra may face prosecution under sec. 409,109,120(B) of I.P.C., for the attempt of misappropriation of Supreme Court funds in conspiracy with others.                                   Adv. Nilesh Ojha                                  National President                                Indian Bar Association                                 Adv. Vijay Kurle                     Maharashtra &Goa State President           ...

Petition filed against Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra seeking action under Contempt and Perjury.   Advocate Siddharth Luthra may face prosecution under sec. 409,109,120(B) of I.P.C., for the attempt of misappropriation of Supreme Court funds in conspiracy with others.                                   Adv. Nilesh Ojha                                  National President                                Indian Bar Association                                Adv. Vijay Kurle                     Maharashtra &Goa State President                        ...

The order passed by the Three Judge Bench in the recent Suo Motu Contempt case against Adv. Prashant Bhushan has OVERRULED the order passed by 2-Judge Bench in the Suo Motu contempt case Re: Vijay Kurle and others. The Three Judge bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra, in their order dated 22.07.2020 have followed to a T the procedure laid down in the Supreme Court Rules as well as the binding precedents of the Supreme Court unlike the order passed by the Bench of Justice Rohinton Nariman and Justice Vineet Saran that has thrown all the laws/rules/binding precedents out of the window. The Bench of Justice (Retd.) Deepak Gupta and Justice Aniruddha Bose had further perpetuated the illegalities committed by the Bench of Justice Rohinton Nariman instead of paying heed to the written and oral submissions of the alleged contemnors in Re: Vijay Kurle and others. The order passed by the three Judge Bench on 22.07.2020 in the matter of Prashant Bhushan has vindicated the arguments put forth by a...

Wanton abuse of power by Justice (Retd.) Deepak Gupta and Justice Aniruddha Bose in appointing a Private Counsel as ‘Amicus Curiae’ instead of the Attorney General/Solicitor General of India as mandated by Rule 10 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1975. Adv. Siddharth Luthra guilty of misappropriation of funds of the Supreme Court by joining the conspiracy by allowing himself to be appointed as an Amicus as against Supreme Court Rules in a contempt of court matter ⮚    As per the Rules, Bench had a choice of appointing either Attorney-General or Solicitor General as an Amicus Curiae in the Contempt Cases. ⮚    The order appointing  an ineligible Adv. Siddharth Luthra as an Amicus and entitling him to claim fee from the government is misappropriation of public funds and is an offence under Sec. 409, 120 (B), 109 & 34 of I.P.C. on the part of Justice Deepak Gupta, Justice Aniruddha Bose and Adv. Siddharth Luthra.               ...

NEW PRECEDENT SET BY THE TWO JUDGE BENCH THAT THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE CONSTITUTION BENCH OF THE SUPREME COURT IS NOT BINDING IF NOT CONFIRMED BY THE PUBLICATIONS OF  ‘LEXIS-NEXIS’        Nothing in the world is more dangerous than               sincere   ignorance and conscientious stupidity.           -       Martin Luther King Jr.                                                                 Adv. Vivek Ramteke                                  Chairman                        All India SC,  ST & Minority               ...